Councillors will finally argue the merits of the controversial public art plan when they meet in June, after residents have their say.

The funding model for the artworks – an automatic 1 per cent of capital works expenditure – had long drawn criticism from councillor Paul Funnell, who wanted to see the money spent on infrastructure and facilities instead.

“The community is outraged over the squandering of their money,” Cr Funnell said. 

“This is one of the most contentious issues known to man and while the argument is that it ‘starts conversations’, well the conversations people have with me about it can’t be repeated publicly.”

Wagga artist Arthur Wicks said the amount of funding allocated to public art was tiny compared to the rest of the city’s budget, but thought temporary installations were more effective.

“The best ones have a short life,” Mr Wicks said. “Something that makes people stop and look is a plus.”

Council community manager Janice Summerhayes said Wagga had “long been a cultural and creative city” and encouraged people to have their say on the plan.

“Public art is one of the key ingredients in fostering culture and creativity that engages and involves the whole community,” she said.

“It’s vital that we hear from the community to make sure this plan continues to reflect the needs and identity of the city as best we can.”

Go to www.yoursaywagga.com.au/peoples-panel to make a submission on the plan.