Climate swindle continues
RECENTLY on SBS TV, we had another reporter promoting propaganda about climate change with the obligatory pictures of chimney stacks spewing forth supposed carbon pollution. In most cases, the “pollution” was condensed water vapour, the same thing as clouds.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
Remember, all the greenhouses gases are invisible.
Of course, Professor “Will E Stepinit” was doing his best to keep the con alive.
On Prime TV local news, we get these references to “climate change”.
“Climate change” is a political term and has nothing to do with science and facts. Have you noticed how it has never been defined by the promoters? The term was agreed upon when the promoters of the climate con realised they had problems with the term “global warming”, as the world was failing to warm as they had forecast.
There have been several studies, which show that there are no trends in extreme weather events.
The usual regurgitation is to blame “climate change” for every weather event.
From the depths of the Little Ice Age the world has warmed about 1 degree celsius and carbon dioxide concentration has increased about 50 per cent. Perhaps the charlatans can tell us how the climate has changed in that time?
Nitrogen is about 78 per cent, and oxygen is over 21 per cent of the atmosphere. That leaves less than 1 per cent for all the other gases such as methane, nitrous oxide, and carbon dioxide.
As oxygen is consumed in the processes of respiration and combustion, are we going to run out of oxygen? Where does the replenishment oxygen come from?
I notice a paucity of responses to my recent essays from the promoters of the climate con.
John Westman
Wagga
Free trade a farce
I HAVE just listened to Tony Abbott and his ministers on ABC radio tell us that they are focused on jobs and growth. I heard “jobs, jobs, jobs” In the same breath the PM said free trade was going to be one of the drivers of jobs. There are many addictions in this world, and it seems that in politics free trade is one of them.
How is it then that most of our major industries have either closed up or gone off shore to survive? The reason, I’d like to point out to Mr Abbott and Mr Shorten, is that they can’t compete with cheap imports that are a direct result of free trade.
Both parties have been responsible for supporting and inflicting this British-inspired, parasitical disease on our industries. There is no compassion it seems for those caught up in this. When we lost 15,000 jobs from our struggling motor industry, the Prime Minister was comparatively ho-hum about it and said it was one of those things he regretted but it would have to be.
Ford, Holden and Toyota have all done their best to stay here but the pressures were too great. Do we really believe that Australia cannot or should not produce anything of consequence?
This is the message I’ve been getting by successive government inactions. I’m 66 years old and I’ve watched it all happen for many years.
We have produced some of the best cars in the world, but when cheap cars are imported here and our industries get very little protection, people will vote with their feet and buy the cheaper option. The manufacturers of free trade knew very well this would happen when it was imposed on us, and now we see the sad results.
So you are concentrating on jobs Mr Abbott? Very good then.
Start by putting the axe to this disastrous free trade and join the Asia Infrastructure Bank (AIIB) which encourages growth and treats every country as a sovereign nation. Something we are not.