News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Public sector cuts hit Wagga 

Public sector cuts hit Wagga

19 Sep, 2011 12:00 AM
THE first axe has fallen on Wagga's public sector jobs under the O'Farrell government with the Department of Industrial Relations slashing a third of its staff.

Across NSW the department will reduce its number from 157 to 109 and the two Wagga positions have been cut, despite expectations the new state government would bring in a decentralisation policy to boost regional public offices.

The two Wagga staff will hopefully be moved on to another position if they choose not to quit.

"If those staff choose to not take a voluntary redundancy NSW IR will do all it can to help them find another position in the NSW public service," NSW IR executive director Vicki Telfer said.

While the job losses are minimal, the closure is a body blow to Wagga and city council which earlier this year resolved to make attempts to attract government offices to the city.

Wagga once hosted a range of administrative offices which were phased out by state Labor since 1995. The most severe was the disbanding of the Department of Education's regional office which saw the office reduced from about 100 staff to 10 and resulted in a protest march down Wagga's main street in 1995.

Member for Wagga Daryl Maguire yesterday defended the cuts, saying the Coalition's strategy required an "adjustment" of staff.

"The thing is that we have our priorities put in place and that will mean some adjustment for staff," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
You need to do better than this Daryl, at the next election I might just "adjust" my vote.

Come on get more government departments decentralised into regional centres like Wagga rather than being Sydney centric

Posted by Steve, 19/09/2011 11:07:33 AM, on The Daily Advertiser
This is probably just the beginning. The rhetoric is hollow,as it is highly unlikely that "adjusted" staff will be able to be placed with other local agencies that are also likely to be "adjusted". The staff involved are skilled specialists that will be a loss to the entire region not just Wagga Wagga. The O'Farrell government seems keen to progress parts of its plan they did not reveal at election time, rather than the issues they publicly campaigned on. Is this an indicator that the election campaign was all show and no substance, designed to deliberately lie to the electorate?
Posted by sparrow, 19/09/2011 1:23:43 PM, on The Daily Advertiser
Mr O'Farrell has learned the ways of the hidden agenda well from his former boss, John Howard. He has started on his own WorkChoices reforms, something he played an integral role for when working with the former PM. I don't recall him speaking with pride about this role during the election campaign. In fact I think he kept it deliberately off the agenda.
Posted by sparrow, 19/09/2011 1:26:52 PM, on The Daily Advertiser
Wagga voted for Maguire and his mate Bazza and now they will get exactly what they deserve i.e even more cuts. This is only the beginning.
Posted by taxpayer, 19/09/2011 2:03:12 PM, on The Daily Advertiser
What else are the new liberal government meant to do? Labor has squandered and wasted tax payer dollars in NSW, running up record debt. Now Liberal are left to try and clean up this mess. Some people aren't going to like the cold hard facts, but these decisions need to be made. Better hard calls are made now, than when we end up like Greece.
Posted by Andrew, 19/09/2011 4:53:59 PM, on The Daily Advertiser
This is only the beginning, and you can lay the blame squarely on the labor=greens governments. Jobs have to go, the place is broke. If we don't get rid of these clowns from Federal politics as well, the whole country will go under.
Posted by emma, 19/09/2011 4:55:45 PM, on The Daily Advertiser
So much for no front line positions. These staff have taken up the fight for a number of workers ripped off, underpaid and poorly treated by their employers. Shame on you Barry O, yet another lie from you and yours.
Posted by Steve Mears, 20/09/2011 12:16:27 AM, on The Daily Advertiser
It would be interesting to see where the other jobs cuts are located. How many in marginal seats, given we will not see the same landslide results at the next election. How many in safe seats and how many in the city vs country locations? We are only seing the local picture. I reckon the big picture is even more scary for the regions.
Posted by sparrow, 20/09/2011 10:06:12 AM, on The Daily Advertiser

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Daily Advertiser







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...