News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Mum grieves as inquest date not set 

Mum grieves as inquest date not set

09 Feb, 2012 07:00 AM
NEXT Monday marks six months since Jason Plum shot himself in the back of a police van at Wagga police station, but his family are no closer to closure or moving on.

Jason was 37 when he died the following day after his family made the heartwrenching decision to turn off the machines that were keeping him alive.

To date, the officers involved in the arrest of Jason have not been stood down, and his mother, Debra Plum, relives the horrific situation every day.

“The last six months have been the worst six months of my entire life ... it’s not just losing a child, the whole situation is just horrible,” she said.

“I look sometimes, just waiting for him to walk back through the door.

“I guess we won’t probably ever (have closure) because it was avoidable and something that shouldn’t have happened.”

The family is still waiting on the return of Jason’s possessions, Debra said, and want to know what happened to their son and father.

They cannot move on until the case is heard in the NSW Coroner’s Court, and they want answers to the 26 questions sent off to the coroner.

“We have not heard whatsoever from them (the coroner), no answer to any questions, no response, nothing at all,” Debra said.

“I’ve got no idea when the inquest will be ... even our solicitor hasn’t seen a brief of evidence.”

The biggest question the family has – the only one that could have changed the entire outcome of that night, Debra claims – is this: why was Jason not searched when he was put into the police van when he was arrested?

Acting duty officer with Griffith police – where the critical incident team is investigating Jason’s death – Troy Kauter, yesterday said no comment could be made as it is in the hands of the coroner.

A spokesman for the NSW Attorney General confirmed the brief of evidence is due to the coroner’s court on April 5, with the matter set for mention on April 13.

There is still no sign of a inquest date.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Debra Plum, Whilst i am sorry for the loss of your son, I would like YOU to infact answer a question that could have changed the outcome of that night : Why was Jason carrying a gun when he was arrested ? As you may or may not be aware carrying a concealed weapon is an offence. So before Daisy Huntly (reporter) insinuates that the officers involved be stood down, maybe Debra Plum can give the coroner the answer ? C'mon Debra we are waiting.
Posted by Hon Justice Crew, 9/02/2012 10:52:26 AM, on The Daily Advertiser
Why was he carrying a gun .... we all know why! Standing down those officers who had to deal with his behaviour is wrong!
Posted by Hmmmm..., 9/02/2012 12:12:38 PM, on The Daily Advertiser
He was a convicted criminal who'd done jail time, carrying a concealed firearm in public. Whatever the COPS did or didn't do, Plum was the one on the wrong side of law. There hasn't been much reporting on this aspect and the actions of Plum himself. Nonetheless one cannot help but feel for his grieving mother
Posted by Devil's advocate, 9/02/2012 1:18:07 PM, on The Daily Advertiser
Yes jason was committing an offence but he was a grown man, to ask ms plum why her son was carrying a gun is just plain childish, like any other workplace there are SOP's that need to be followed, the investigation will determine whether or not these were followed and like any other workplace if they were not then there will be repremands. Criminal or not a person has lost their life a family has lost a son and many people have lost a friend,questions need answering, lessons need to be learned from this horrible occurance so it can be prevented from ever happening again in the future
Posted by g unit, 9/02/2012 7:14:46 PM, on The Daily Advertiser

The police are stone walling and not answering the mothers questions and the poor mum learned it is in for mention from the newspaper as the police failed to inform the family.

If the police have done nothing wrong than they should be able to answer the mums questions rather than stone walling the family.

A family has lost a part of them and some have not even got enough decency to realise the family are entitled to answers to their questions if they can be answered.


Posted by you serious, 10/02/2012 11:06:36 AM, on The Daily Advertiser
i think you will find that police procedure in cases where a persons demeanour is so volatile, and people in the area are deemed at risk, then policy is to remove from the immediate public and depending on the situation this will be done without a person search
Posted by anon, 10/02/2012 2:21:16 PM, on The Daily Advertiser
I agree with that and there are also vital warnings put in place for those whom may be of serious risk to themselves or others. That should have been communicated to the police that night. Warnings are there for a reason and i would have thought if someone was considered a serious risk all the more reason to search.
Posted by you serious, 10/02/2012 6:35:00 PM, on The Daily Advertiser

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Daily Advertiser







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...