News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Community has shown its support 

Community has shown its support

10 Jun, 2009 10:13 AM
WAGGA City Council general manager Lyn Russell has hit back at claims the city’s proposed Riverside Precinct project is not well supported by the community.

Responding to claims made by Friends of the Lake founder Robert Lazzarini in The Daily Advertiser yesterday, Mrs Russell said she believed a large proportion of Wagga residents felt the precinct should be a high priority for council.

She said more than 700 people had provided positive feedback through direct consultation and a community survey earlier this year.

“We’ve had major community consultation over the last few months and the community is very keen to see something happening here,” she said.

“We’ve been pretty rigorous about making sure we’ve consulted properly before going ahead with the master plan.”

Mrs Russell said Mr Lazzarini’s concerns that Lake Albert was being neglected by the council were unfounded, with nearly $750,000 assigned towards rehabilitation and improvements in the next 10-year plan.

She said neither project would have funding reduced in order to boost the scale of the other.

“Both projects are critical to the future of the city, so we’re not looking for a win-lose, we’re looking for a win-win,” she said.

“We’re funding both projects and we’ve got the capacity in our next 10-year plan to actually do some quite good work.

“We think they’re both really valuable and important projects for the city and over the next few years are going to bring great benefits.”

Mrs Russell admitted flooding was a significant concern for council in the construction of the precinct, but that design company KIAH Infranet would take flooding into consideration as part of the master plan currently under development.

Despite calls for large-scale engineering work for Lake Albert, Mrs Russell said no amount of construction and stormwater diversion would benefit Lake Albert unless decent rain fell throughout winter.

“The biggest challenge we face with Lake Albert is that the lake’s water levels are determined by nature, not by council and I’m hoping we’re getting a bit of water in there at the moment,” she said.

“It will be an ongoing project for the city, but the only bottom line is we can’t make it rain, and even if we divert the storm water into the lake it won’t be enough to counteract the effects of things like evaporation.

“You’ll never get huge volumes of water

coming in to counteract that, the best thing we can do is wait for the rains to come in and replenish it.”

COMMUNITY SUPPORT: Wagga City Council general manager Lyn Russell believes the Riverside Precinct project is well supported by the community.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Would Ms. Russell: 1. Agree to publish the cost of the Insite Community and Stakeholder Consultation, April 2009. 2. Agree that 160 invitational letters, advertisements in the local press and Council web page media releases were used to support the Riverside consultation process. 3.Agree that the results published by these reputable consultants agree with the numbers published in the Cross/Lewington submission in regards to numbers of participants at organised consultation meetings.
Posted by Lake Guardian, 11/06/2009 2:41:25 PM
Something here ... to use a word from the Lake Albert dictionary...smells FISHY!
Posted by MPA, 22/06/2009 11:33:46 AM
Do not take water from the river to fill the lake.Marshall creek runs INTO the river.It does not flow backwards.There is enough area around Wagga to create wet lands to treat and retain water to use in the lake and to water parks and your wonderful Botanic gardens.It might not rain much in Wagga,hell i know, but if you use your storm water wisely there will be plenty.the technology is there....use it.
Posted by Johno, 27/06/2009 8:56:57 PM
Maybe the golf course could stop taking water out of the lake to water its elitist greens. I live on the Lake, and we have had more than enough rainwater to fill it, of late. It filled about four years back after one decent downfall! Some of the oldtimers say that all of the construction around the lake has stopped up the creeks and watercourses that used to feed the lake after it rained. One man told me that the natural watercouses were being diverted so that new housing estates could be built. Why on earth do we still need the pump at the Kooringal Road end of the lake? The water used to flow freely from the creek without a pump! Something is definitely rotten, and it isn't just the dead fish.
Posted by Renee Frost, 4/07/2009 1:37:16 AM
Once proper storm water diversions are in place, the lake should fill itself in no time at all. But to do this, the water will need to be diverted around Gregadoo waste rather than just disappear into the dump and never make its way into the lake? Council needs to concentrate on existing assets rather than start new projects like the riverside precinct!! Also, I like to add that all posts are in favour of fixing the Lake!!!
Posted by MP, 6/07/2009 4:56:58 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Yourguide to Your Toyota
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...